4.8 Article

Selenium sulfide cathode with copper foam interlayer for promising magnesium electrochemistry

期刊

ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
卷 26, 期 -, 页码 23-31

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.12.030

关键词

Magnesium battery; Selenium sulfide; Copper foam interlayer; Polysulfide; Polyselenide

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB0104300]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA22010602, XDA22010600]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [51625204]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnesium (Mg) metal anode pairing with Sulfur (S) cathode has been regarded as a promising contender for next-generation battery technology holding the characteristics of safety in use, low cost and high energy density. However, the sluggish kinetic and the inferior reversibility of Mg-S electrochemical reaction are two main challenges impeding the development of practical Mg-S batteries. Herein, SeS2 is proposed as a superior cathode for Mg batteries based on the complementary features of S (high specific capacity) and Se (high electronic conductivity). In this designed Mg-SeS2 battery with a Cu foam interlayer between cathode and separator, SeS2 compositing with ordered mesoporous carbon (SeS2/CMK3) exhibits impressive electrochemical performance. Various characterizations towards the electrochemical evolution on cathode side reveal that Cu foam interlayer not only acts as the trapping layer by the rapid chemical immobilization of polysulfide (polyselenide) species on Cu foam, but also serves as a promoter to propel the overall charge-discharge kinetics by the reversible displacement reaction between copper sulfide (copper selenide) and Mg2+. Benefiting from the unique advantages of SeS2/CMK3 and the rationally designed Cu interlayer, this novel Mg-SeS2 system demonstrates a feasible strategy to exploit the rechargeable Mg batteries with low cost, high areal capacity and large current capability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据