4.8 Article

Visible-light-driven selective oxidation of alcohols using a dye-sensitized TiO2-polyoxometalate catalyst

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 351, 期 -, 页码 59-66

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2017.03.017

关键词

Photo-oxidation; Alcohol; Visible light; TiO2; Dye; Polyoxometalate

资金

  1. 973 Program [2014CB845605, 2013CB933200]
  2. National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21521061, 21331006, 21520102001]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB20000000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrated a dye-sensitized TiO2-polyoxometalate system (denoted TiO2-(PW12-TH) 8, where PW12 = PW12O403 and TH = thionine) for selective oxidation of alcohols under visible light. The results showed that various substituted alcohols were transformed into their corresponding aldehydes with high selectivity. Due to more efficient electrons transfer, large surface area, and enhanced visible light absorption, the photocatalytic activity of TiO2-(PW12-TH) 8 was superior to any other dyesensitized system reported to date. The response in the photocurrent-time curves over several on/off cycles of intermittent irradiation showed good reproducibility. The photocurrent response of TiO2(PW12-TH) 8 was much higher than that of TiO2/TH (physical mixture of TiO2 and TH), SiO2-(PW12-TH) 8 or P25-(PW12-TH) 8 (P25 = Degussa P25), attributed to the more efficient transfer and longer lifetime of photoexcited electrons. This photocatalytic process confirmed that efficient electron transfer during photocatalytic oxidation plays a vital role in determining the reaction conversion and obtaining good selectivity. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra and radical scavenging experiments proved that superoxide radicals and electrons were the main reactive species in the proposed system, the absence of hydroxyl radicals and holes is demonstrated to be the key of high reaction selectivity. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据