4.8 Article

Aqueous electrosynthesis of silver indium selenide nanocrystals and their photothermal properties

期刊

GREEN CHEMISTRY
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 1239-1248

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9gc03647d

关键词

-

资金

  1. CNPq [UNIVERSAL-401541/2016-9, UNIVERSAL-457537/2014-0, UNIVERSAL-421312/2018-1, PQ2306132/2017-6, PQ1B-306306/2014-0, PQ1A-303893/2018-4, PIBIC-2014/2015, 164652/2017-5]
  2. FACEPE [APQ-0549-1.06/17/INCT 2014, APQ-0443.1.06/15, BFP-0051.1.06/18]
  3. CAPES [PROEX-433/2010]
  4. FAPEMIG [PPM-00760-16, BCN-TEC 30030/12, UNIVERSAL-APQ-0029118]
  5. FINEP (CTINFRA-PROINFRA 2008/2009/2010/2011/2012/2013/2014)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The eco-friendly aqueous electrosynthesis of AgIn5Se8 (AISe) nanocrystals (NCs), and their respective core/shell structure AgIn5Se8/ZnS NCs (AISe/ZnS), was carried out by using l-glutathione (GSH) as a stabilizer. Se-0 direct reduction was carried out in a graphite powder macroelectrode of an electrochemical cavity cell, controlled by current (i = 30 mA) and electric charge (Q = 11.6 C). The generated Se2- ions react with In3+ and Ag+ ions in the intermediate compartment of the cell to give AISe NCs. A paired electrolysis (Zn-0 anode/S-0 in a graphite powder cathode) was carried out to prepare ZnS-GSH NCs, using the same electrochemical apparatus (i = 30 mA and Q = 9.6 C). The effects of the Ag+/In3+ ratio (0.5, 0.28 and 0.18) and ZnS shell on the optical properties of AISe NCs were investigated. The ternary AISe NCs were characterized by XRD and HRTEM, which revealed that AgIn5Se8 had a cubic phase structure (Ag+/In3+ = 0.18) and the ZnS shell had a zinc blende structure. The shell growth promoted a heterojunction formation with different crystalline phases, leading to a quantum yield decrease (QY: AISe = 18.6%; AISe/ZnS = 16.0%). The NCs were irradiated with a near-infrared laser at different power densities (lambda(exc) = 785 nm). AISe and AISe/ZnS samples showed photothermal response, reaching 381 K and 402 K, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据