4.7 Article

Neutrophil dysregulation is pathogenic in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

期刊

JCI INSIGHT
卷 5, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.134189

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the NIH, NIAMS [ZIAAR041199]
  2. NIEHS [Z01ES101074]
  3. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT) [SEP-CB2017-2018, A1-S23262]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [ZIAAR041203, ZIAAR041199] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [ZIAES101074] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are characterized by muscle inflammation and weakness, myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs), and extramuscular organ damage. The role of neutrophil dysregulation and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETS) in IIM is unclear. We assessed whether pathogenic neutrophil subsets (low-density granulocytes [LDGsI) and NETs were elevated in IIM, associated with clinical presentation and MSAs, and their effect on skeletal myoblasts and myotubes. Circulating NETs and LDGs were quantified and correlated with clinical measures. Specific MSAs were tested for their ability to induce NETs. NETs and neutrophil gene expression were measured in IIM biopsies. Whether NETs damage skeletal myoblasts and myotubes was tested. Circulating LOGs and NETs were increased in IIM. IIM LOGs had an enhanced ability to form NETs. LOGs and NETs correlated with JIM disease activity and muscle damage. The serum MSA anti-MOM correlated with circulating and tissue NETs and directly enhanced NET formation. An enhanced neutrophil gene signature was present in IIM muscle and associated with muscle injury and tissue IFN gene signatures. IIM NETs decreased the viability of myotubes in a citrullinated histone-dependent manner. Dysregulated neutrophil pathways may play pathogenic roles in IIM through their ability to directly injure muscle cells and other affected tissues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据