4.6 Article

An amorphous trimetallic (Ni-Co-Fe) hydroxide-sheathed 3D bifunctional electrode for superior oxygen evolution and high-performance cable-type flexible zinc-air batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 8, 期 11, 页码 5601-5611

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ta00888e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51602109, 21972006]
  2. Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [2017A030313283, 2017A030313083]
  3. Shenzhen Peacock Plan [KQTD2016053015544057]
  4. Nanshan Pilot Plan [LHTD20170001]
  5. Guangdong Science and Technology Program [2017B030314002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The emerging flexible/wearable electronics have greatly stimulated research on portable batteries with high specific energy and excellent mechanical properties. State-of-the-art zinc-air batteries (ZABs) are potential candidates for flexible energy supply; however, their development is hindered by the sluggish kinetics of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER)/oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) of an air cathode. Herein, we demonstrate a 3D integrated bifunctional oxygen electrode of NiCo2O4@NiCoFe-hydroxide nanoarrays for flexible all-solid-state ZABs. Owing to the intact mesoporous nanoarrays synergized with the amorphous trimetallic hydroxide sheath, the free-standing NiCo2O4@NiCoFe-hydroxide electrode exhibited excellent bifunctional activities with an ultralow potential difference of 695 mV between OER and ORR. The NiCo2O4@NiCoFe-hydroxide-based planar aqueous ZAB achieved high discharge capacity (723 mA h g(zinc)(-1) at 10 mA cm(-2)), high energy density (864.2 W h kg(zinc)(-1) at 5 mA cm(-2)) and long cycle life of up to 250 h. More significantly, cable-type all-solid-state ZABs fabricated with the 3D oxygen electrode demonstrated an impressive volumetric energy density of 38.1 mW h cm(-3) and high mechanical flexibility even after 2000 bending cycles, highlighting their enormous potential for flexible/wearable energy applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据