4.3 Article

A randomized controlled trial of eicosapentaenoic acid in patients with coronary heart disease on statins

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 70, 期 5-6, 页码 537-544

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.07.007

关键词

Residual risk; Intravascular ultrasound; Coronary plaque; Eicosapentaenoic acid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: There is a residual risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) despite intensive statin therapy for secondary prevention. The aim of this study was to investigate whether coronary plaque regression and stabilization are reinforced by the addition of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) to high-dose pitavastatin (PTV). Methods: We enrolled 193 CHD patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in six hospitals. Patients were randomly allocated to the PTV group (PTV 4 mg/day, n = 96) or PTV/EPA group (PTV 4 mg/day and EPA 1800 mg/day, n = 97), and prospectively followed for 6-8 months. Coronary plaque volume and composition in nonstenting lesions were analyzed by integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound (IB-IVUS). Results: The PTV/EPA group showed a greater reduction in total atheroma volume compared to PTV group. IB-IVUS analyses revealed that lipid volume was significantly decreased during follow-up period in only PTV/EPA group. The efficacy of additional EPA therapy on lipid volume reduction was significantly higher in stable angina pectoris (SAP) patients compared to acute coronary syndrome patients. EPA/AA ratio was significantly improved in PTV/EPA group compared to PTV group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events and side effects. Conclusions: Combination EPA/PTV therapy significantly reduced coronary plaque volume compared to PTV therapy alone. Plaque stabilization was also reinforced by EPA/PTV therapy in particular SAP patients. The addition of EPA is a promising option to reduce residual CHD risk under intensive statin therapy. (C) 2017 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据