4.6 Article

InvivoPen: A novel plasma source for in vivo cancer treatment

期刊

JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 2273-2282

出版社

IVYSPRING INT PUBL
DOI: 10.7150/jca.38613

关键词

triple negative breast cancer; plasma jet; invivoPen; plasma activated medium; cancer treatment

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81972789]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project [2018ZX10302205-004-002]
  3. Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province [SWYY-128]
  4. Technology Development Funding of Wuxi [WX18IVJN017]
  5. Major Project of Science and Technology in Henan Province [161100311400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: With the anti-cancer efficacies of cold atmospheric plasma being increasingly recognized in vitro, a demand on creating an effective tool feasible for in vivo animal treatment has emerged. Methods: Through the use of co-axial needles with different calibers in diameter, we designed a novel in situ ejection source of cold atmospheric plasma, namely invivoPen, for animal experiments. It punches just a single pinhole that could considerably ease the complexity of operating with small animals such as mouse. Results: We showed that invivoPen could deliver similar efficacies as plasma activated medium with reduced cost in suppressing cell proliferation and migration as well as potentially boosting the viabilities of mice receiving invivoPen treatment. Blood test, renal and liver functionalities tests all suggest that physical plasma could effectively return tumor-carrying mice to the healthy state without harm to body conditions, and invivoPen slightly outweighs PAM in boosting animal immunity and reducing inflammation. Conclusion: Our study contributes to the community in providing a minimal invasive in situ plasma source, having partly explained the efficacies of cold atmospheric plasma in treating triple negative breast cancers, and proposing the potential synergies between physical plasma and conventional drugs for cancer treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据