4.6 Article

α2,6-linked sialic acid serves as a high-affinity receptor for cancer oncolytic virotherapy with Newcastle disease virus

期刊

JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 143, 期 11, 页码 2171-2181

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-017-2470-y

关键词

NDV; Sialic acid receptors; ST6Gal I; Oncolytic effect

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31571434, 81172144, 81201776]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project [2015CB553701, 2012ZX10002-015, 2012AA020806]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Newcastle disease virus (NDV) has been applied to oncolytic virotherapy for decades due to its naturally oncolytic property. In spite of the substantiation of the sialic acid receptors of NDV on host cells, knowledge of preference of sialic acid linkage in viral attachment and oncolytic effect is lacking and imperative to be elucidated. Surface plasmon resonance analysis and competitive inhibition with sialylated glycan receptor analogues were used to determine the affinity and the preference of sialic acid receptor. Treatments of sialyltransferase inhibitors and linkage-specific sialidases and transfection with sialyltransferase expression vector were performed to regulate sialic acids levels. We demonstrated that sialic acid was essential for NDV binding and infection of tumor cells. alpha 2,6-linked sialic acid served as a high-affinity receptor for NDV and the ST6Gal I sialyltransferase that synthesizes alpha 2-6 linkage of sialylated N-linked glycans in CHO-K1 cells promoted NDV binding and cytopathic effect. More importantly, an enhanced antitumor effect of NDV on aggressive SW620 colorectal carcinoma cells with high-level of cell surface alpha 2,6-sialylation, but not SW480 cells with relative low-level of alpha 2,6-sialylation, was observed both in vitro and in vivo. The study provides evidence of optimized therapeutic strategy in oncolytic virotherapy via partly defining alpha 2,6-sialylated receptor as a cellular marker for NDV.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据