4.5 Article

Vapor-fed photoelectrolysis of water at 0.3 V using gas-diffusion photoanodes of SrTiO3 layers

期刊

SUSTAINABLE ENERGY & FUELS
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 1443-1453

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9se01068h

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology (PRESTO) [JPMJPR15S1, JPMJPR16S7, JPMJPR18T1]
  2. Joint Research of Institute for Molecular Science (IMS) [606]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large scale production of H-2 using renewable energy can be realized by photoelectrochemical (PEC) splitting of water vapor in the gas phase. Air humidity can be a water source for producing solar H-2. The concept is based on photoelectrochemistry in a gaseous environment using a proton exchange membrane (PEM) as a solid polymer electrolyte and a macroporous semiconductor electrode wrapped in a perfluorosulfonic acid ionomer. A prototype vapor-fed PEC cell using a TiO2 gas-diffusion electrode as an O-2-evolving photoanode and a carbon-supported platinum catalyst cathode achieved water splitting to produce O-2 and H-2, which are physically separated from each other by the PEM. Herein, we demonstrate a PEM-PEC system consisting of a strontium titanate (SrTiO3) nanocrystalline layer decorated on titanium microfiber felt to achieve overall water splitting into H-2 and O-2 at a ratio of 2 : 1 on each electrode at an applied voltage of only 0.3 V under gaseous conditions. In comparison with TiO2 electrodes, the SrTiO3 gas-diffusion electrode decreased the external voltage and suppressed the gradual decomposition of the ionomer coated on the photoanode. These differences are because of the cathodic shift of the photocurrent onset potential and improvement of the Faraday efficiency of O-2 evolution, respectively. The interface between the SrTiO3 surface and the ionomer thin film exhibited fast kinetics for O-2 evolution from water adsorbates supplied from the gas phase and durability under ultraviolet light irradiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据