4.6 Article

Characterization of a kHz atmospheric pressure plasma jet: comparison of discharge propagation parameters in experiments and simulations without target

期刊

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6595/ab6d49

关键词

plasma jet; benchmarking; electric field; electron density; discharge propagation; fluid model; Thomson scattering

资金

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche of France [ANR-16-CE06-0005-01]
  2. French governmental fellowship
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR), as part of the programme `Investissements d'avenir' [ANR-11-IDEX-0004-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper quantitatively characterizes a kHz atmospheric pressure He plasma jet without target powered by a pulse of positive applied voltage. It focuses on a quantitative comparison between experimental measurements and numerical results of a two-dimensional fluid model using the same configuration, for different values of magnitude and width of pulsed applied voltage. Excellent agreement is obtained between experiments and simulations on the gas mixture distribution, the length and velocity of discharge propagation and the electric field in the discharge front. For the first time in the same jet, the experimentally measured increase of the electric field in the plume is confirmed by the simulations. The electron density and temperature, measured behind the high field front, are found to agree qualitatively. Moreover, the comparison with simulations shows that discharge propagation stops when the potential in the discharge head is lower than a critical value. Hence, pulse width and magnitude allow to control propagation length. For long pulses (>= 1000 ns), the potential in the discharge front reaches this critical value during the pulse. For shorter pulses, propagation is determined by the pulse shape, as the critical value is reached around 90-130 ns after the fall of the pulse. The results suggest that the magnitude of this critical value is defined by the gas mixture at the position of the front.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据