4.6 Review

Strategies for inhibiting anode dendrite growth in lithium-sulfur batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 8, 期 9, 页码 4629-4646

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta12910c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2018YFA0702002, 2019YFA0705700]
  2. Link Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1301244]
  3. Link Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [U1301244]
  4. National Key Research and Development Program (Japan-China Joint Research Program) [2017YFE9127900]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21978332, 51573215, 21706294]
  6. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2016A030313354]
  7. Guangdong Province Sci Tech Bureau [2019A1515010803, 2017B090901003, 2016B010114004]
  8. Guangzhou Scientific and Technological Planning Project [201904010271, 201804020025, 201707010424]
  9. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [171gjc37, 18lgpy32]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, lithium-sulfur batteries have attracted considerable attention due to their high theoretical specific capacity (1673 mA h g(-1)) and high energy density (2800 W h kg(-1)), which is regarded as the most promising next-generation energy used for portable electronic devices, vehicles, and energy storage systems. However, there are still some problems that persist for the practical applications of lithium-sulfur batteries; in particular, the problems caused by lithium dendrite growth can seriously hinder the real-world applications and development of lithium-sulfur batteries. In this paper, we summarize the strategies of lithium anode improvement formulated in recent years, and we introduce them in sufficient progressive order on the basis of three aspects: anode surface modification, anode modification, and anode structure design. Nevertheless, the growth of lithium dendrites is still a formidable problem, and we have to continue devoting time and energy toward addressing this issue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据