4.6 Article

Octreotide Is Ineffective in Treating Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia: Results of a Short-Term Therapy

期刊

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH
卷 32, 期 8, 页码 1667-1671

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3162

关键词

TUMOR-INDUCED BONE DISEASE; CANCER; OSTEOMALACIA AND RICKETS; DISEASES AND DISORDERS OF/RELATED TO BONE; PTH/VIT D/FGF23; CELL/TISSUE SIGNALING; ENDOCRINE

资金

  1. NIH, Division of Intramural Research of the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO) is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome in which unregulated hypersecretion of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) by phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors (PMT) causes renal phosphate wasting, hypophosphatemia, and osteomalacia. The resulting mineral homeostasis abnormalities and skeletal manifestations can be reversed with surgical resection of the tumor. Unfortunately, PMTs are often difficult to locate, and medical treatment with oral phosphate and vitamin D analogues is either insufficient to manage the disease or not tolerated. Octreotide has been proposed as a potential treatment for TIO due to the presence of somatostatin receptors (SSTR) on PMTs; however, the role of somatostatin signaling in PMTs and the efficacy of treatment of TIOs with somatostatin analogues is not clear. In an effort to evaluate the efficacy of octreotide therapy in TIO, five subjects with TIO were treated with octreotide for 3 days. Blood intact FGF23, phosphate, and 1,25(OH)(2)D-3, and tubular reabsorption of phosphate (TRP) were measured at frequent time points during treatment. Octreotide's effects were assessed by comparing group means of the biochemical parameters at each time-point to mean baseline values. There were no significant changes in blood phosphate, FGF23, 1,25(OH)(2)D-3, or TRP during octreotide treatment, consistent with a lack of efficacy of octreotide in treating TIO. (C) 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据