4.7 Article

CuS@mSiO(2)-PEG core-shell nanoparticles as a NIR light responsive drug delivery nanoplatform for efficient chemo-photothermal therapy

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 44, 期 22, 页码 10343-10351

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5dt00198f

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21171035, 51472049, 51302035]
  2. Key Grant Project of Chinese Ministry of Education [313015]
  3. PhD Programs Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China [20110075110008, 20130075120001]
  4. National 863 Program of China [2013AA031903]
  5. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [13ZR1451200]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  7. Program Innovative Research Team in University [IRT1221]
  8. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [B603]
  9. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [111-2-04]
  10. Shanghai Municipal Nature Science Foundation [13ZR1433300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report a facile and low-cost approach to design a difunctional nanoplatform (CuS@mSiO(2)-PEG) as a near-infrared (NIR) light responsive drug delivery system for efficient chemo-photothermal therapy. The nanoplatform demonstrated good biocompatibility and colloidal stability, as well as high loading capacity for the anticancer drug (26.5 wt% for doxorubicin (DOX)). The CuS nanocrystals (core) within these CuS@mSiO(2)-PEG core-shell nanoparticles can effectively absorb and convert NIR light to fatal heat under NIR light irradiation for photothermal therapy, and the release of DOX from the mesoporous silica (shell) can be triggered by pH and NIR light for chemotherapy. When the CuS@mSiO(2)-PEG/DOX nanocomposites were irradiated by 980 nm light, both chemotherapy and photothermal therapy were simultaneously driven, resulting in a synergistic effect for killing cancer cells. Importantly, compared with chemotherapy or photothermal treatment alone, the combined therapy significantly improved the therapeutic efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据