4.5 Article

OpenMS - A platform for reproducible analysis of mass spectrometry data

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 261, 期 -, 页码 142-148

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.05.016

关键词

Mass spectrometry; Tool collection; Analysis workflows; Software libraries; Reproducible research

资金

  1. BMBF [031A535A, 031A430C, 01ZX1301F]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB685/B1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In recent years, several mass spectrometry-based omics technologies emerged to investigate qualitative and quantitative changes within thousands of biologically active components such as proteins, lipids and metabolites. The research enabled through these methods potentially contributes to the diagnosis and pathophysiology of human diseases as well as to the clarification of structures and interactions between biomolecules. Simultaneously, technological advances in the field of mass spectrometry leading to an ever increasing amount of data, demand high standards in efficiency, accuracy and reproducibility of potential analysis software. Results: This article presents the current state and ongoing developments in OpenMS, a versatile open-source framework aimed at enabling reproducible analyses of high-throughput mass spectrometry data. It provides implementations of frequently occurring processing operations on MS data through a clean application programming interface in C+ + and Python. A collection of 185 tools and ready-made workflows for typical MS-based experiments enable convenient analyses for non-developers and facilitate reproducible research without losing flexibility. Conclusions: OpenMS will continue to increase its ease of use for developers as well as users with improved continuous integration/deployment strategies, regular trainings with updated training materials and multiple sources of support. The active developer community ensures the incorporation of new features to support state of the art research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据