4.7 Article

Impact of the Rotation and Compactness of Progenitors on the Mass of Black Holes

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 888, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab584d

关键词

Astrophysical black holes; Stellar mass black holes; Stellar mass loss; Computational methods; Gravitational wave astronomy; Massive stars

资金

  1. European Research Council [770017]
  2. European Union [794393]
  3. MIUR through Progetto Premiale FIGARO
  4. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [794393] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [770017] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate the impact of stellar rotation on the formation of black holes (BHs) by means of our population synthesis code sevn. Rotation affects the mass function of BHs in several ways. In massive metal-poor stars, fast rotation reduces the minimum zero-age main sequence (ZAMS) mass for a star to undergo pair instability and pulsational pair instability. Moreover, stellar winds are enhanced by rotation, peeling off the entire hydrogen envelope. As a consequence of these two effects, the maximum BH mass we expect from the collapse of a rotating metal-poor star is only similar to 45 M, while the maximum mass of a BH born from a nonrotating star is similar to 60 M. Furthermore, stellar rotation reduces the minimum ZAMS mass for a star to collapse into a BH from similar to 18-25 M to similar to 13-18 M. Finally, we have investigated the impact of different core-collapse supernova (CCSN) prescriptions on our results. While the threshold value of compactness for direct collapse and the fallback efficiency strongly affect the minimum ZAMS mass for a star to collapse into a BH, the fraction of the hydrogen envelope that can be accreted onto the final BH is the most important ingredient in determining the maximum BH mass. Our results confirm that the interplay between stellar rotation, CCSNe and pair instability plays a major role in shaping the BH mass spectrum.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据