4.7 Article

The structure, photoluminescence and influence of temperature on energy transfer in co-doped Ca9La(GeO4)0.75(PO4)6 red-emission phosphors

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 44, 期 19, 页码 9241-9250

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5dt00866b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20120211130003]
  2. National Natural Science Funds of China [51372105]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [lzujbky-2014-231]
  4. Gansu Province Development and Reform Commission
  5. Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the Gansu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel phosphate Ca9La(GeO4)(0.75)(PO4)(6) was investigated to add to the family of phosphate phosphors and application in LEDs. In this work, the single phase red-emission Ce3+, Mn2+ co-doped phosphate Ca9La(GeO4)(0.75)(PO4)(6) phosphor was synthesized by the solid-state reaction from both theoretical and practical points of view. The crystal structure was determined by Rietveld refinement and TEM. Its cell parameters are a = b = 10.4077605(2) angstrom, and c = 37.4714968(1) angstrom. The characteristic photoluminescence properties were studied in detail using photoluminescence excitation spectra, emission spectra, decay times and thermal quenching properties. Purple and red broad band emission from Ce3+ and Mn2+ was detected under excitation at 313 nm. According to this research, the Ca9La(GeO4)(0.75)(PO4)(6): Ce3+, Mn2+ phosphor shows high thermal stability in the red-emission area. With the increase of the temperature, the intensity ratio of Mn2+ and Ce3+ emission rises rapidly and the purity of red-emission is improved. In order to reasonably explain this special phenomenon, an implicit mechanism between thermal quenching and energy transfer is proposed based on the configurational coordinate diagram. In addition, the mechanism could be helpful for understanding the thermal properties of multiple activators Ce3+ and Mn2+ co-doped phosphors as the reference.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据