4.7 Article

Implementation of Yale Interactive terrestrial Biosphere model v1.0 into GEOS-Chem v12.0.0: a tool for biosphere-chemistry interactions

期刊

GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 1137-1153

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-13-1137-2020

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41975155]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFA0606802, 2017YFA0603802]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The terrestrial biosphere and atmospheric chemistry interact through multiple feedbacks, but the models of vegetation and chemistry are developed separately. In this study, the Yale Interactive terrestrial Biosphere (YIBs) model, a dynamic vegetation model with biogeochemical processes, is implemented into the Chemical Transport Model GEOS-Chem (GC) version 12.0.0. Within this GC-YIBs framework, leaf area index (LAI) and canopy stomatal conductance dynamically predicted by YIBs are used for dry deposition calculation in GEOS-Chem. In turn, the simulated surface ozone (O-3) by GEOS-Chem affect plant photosynthesis and biophysics in YIBs. The updated stomatal conductance and LAI improve the simulated O-3 dry deposition velocity and its temporal variability for major tree species. For daytime dry deposition velocities, the model-to-observation correlation increases from 0.69 to 0.76, while the normalized mean error (NME) decreases from 30.5% to 26.9% using the GC-YIBs model. For the diurnal cycle, the NMEs decrease by 9.1% for Amazon forests, 6.8% for coniferous forests, and 7.9% for deciduous forests using the GC-YIBs model. Furthermore, we quantify the damaging effects of O-3 on vegetation and find a global reduction of annual gross primary productivity by 1.5 %-3.6 %, with regional extremes of 10.9 %-14.1% in the eastern USA and eastern China. The online GC-YIBs model provides a useful tool for discerning the complex feedbacks between atmospheric chemistry and the terrestrial biosphere under global change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据