4.6 Article

Designing a multifaceted bio-interface nanofiber tissue-engineered tubular scaffold graft to promote neo-vascularization for urethral regeneration

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
卷 8, 期 8, 页码 1748-1758

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9tb01915d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81771629, 81900619]
  2. 2013 National Clinical Key Specialist Construction Project (paediatric surgery) [5001-2140019]
  3. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2018M630936]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reconstitution of urethral defects through a tissue-engineered autologous urethra is an exciting area of clinical urology research. Despite rapid advances in this field, a tissue-engineered urethra is still inaccessible to clinical applications because of the poor vascularization of the current scaffold materials, especially for the reconstruction of complex urethral defects. In this study, we report the preparation of multifaceted bio-interfacing tissue-engineered autologous scaffolds based on alternating block polyurethane (abbreviated as PU-alt), a kind of tubular scaffold with a hierarchical nanofiber architecture, flexible mechanical properties and a hydrophilic PEGylation interface capable of promoting adhesion, oriented elongation, and proliferation of New Zealand rabbit autologous urethral epithelial cells (ECs) and smooth muscle cells (SMCs) simultaneously, and also upregulating the expression of keratin (AE1/AE3) in ECs and contractile protein (alpha-SMA) in SMCs as well as the subsequent synthesis of elastin. Three months in vivo scaffold substitution of rabbit urethras displayed that the engineered autologous PU-alt scaffold grafts, with a coating rich in seed cell-matrix, could induce local neo-vascularization, facilitating oriented SMC remodeling and lumen epithelialization as well as patency. Our findings indicate a central role of the synergistic interplay of seed cell-matrix bio-interface and nano-topographic cues in the vascularized urethral reconstruction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据