4.7 Article

Metal organic frameworks as a compatible reinforcement in a biopolymer bone scaffold

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 973-984

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9qm00772e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51935014, 51905553, 81871494, 81871498, 51705540]
  2. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2019JJ50774, 2018JJ3671, 2019JJ50588]
  3. JiangXi Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [20192ACB20005]
  4. Guangdong Province Higher Vocational Colleges & Schools Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme (2018)
  5. Open Sharing Fund for the Large-scale Instruments and Equipments of Central South University
  6. Project of Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Plan [2017RS3008]
  7. Scientific Research Fund of Jiangxi Provincial Education Department [GJJ170530]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The insufficient mechanical strength and slow degradation rate of poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA) limit its applications in bone repair. In this study, zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8), one typical metal organic framework, was introduced into a laser-sintered PLLA scaffold. The results showed that the ZIF-8 formed favorable interface bonding with PLLA due to its inherent hydrophobicity and abundant organic ligands. Meanwhile, it served as an efficient nucleating site and increased the crystallinity of PLLA. Thus, the tensile and compressive strength was improved by 36.9% and 85.6%, respectively. On the other hand, ZIF-8 was biodegradable and its degradation rate would speed up in an acid environment caused by the degradation of PLLA. In this condition, numerous cavities resulting from the degradation of ZIF-8 on the scaffold surface promoted the invasion of the immersion solution, which considerably enhanced the degradation rate. Besides, ZIF-8 released nutrient Zn element during degradation, which favored cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation. It was suggested that the scaffold showed great potential as a candidate for bone implantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据