3.8 Article

Persistence of clonal azole-resistant isolates of Candida albicans from a patient with chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis in Colombia

期刊

JOURNAL OF GLOBAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 16-+

出版社

WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/jgid.jgid_74_19

关键词

Candida albicans; chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis; drug susceptibility; Galleria mellonella; multilocus sequence typing

资金

  1. Direccion de Investigacion e Innovacion, Universidad Del Rosario [7710]
  2. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Bogotd, Colombia [7710]
  3. ECOS Nord mobility (Colombia-France)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The present article describes retrospectively a case of a patient with chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis (CMC) who presented recurrent Candida albicans infection since he was 6 months old. We obtained 16 isolates recovered during a 4-year period. Our purpose was to determinate the susceptibility, genotyping, and the pathogenicity profile in all the isolates. Methods: Sixteen C. albicans were isolated from a 25-year-old male with several recurrent fungal infections admitted to Hospital. The isolates were recovered during 4 years from a different anatomical origin. We typified them by multilocus sequence typing, also we evaluated susceptibility to fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, isavuconazole, caspofungin, and amphotericin B by microdilution method and we also test the pathogenic capacity in the Galleria mellonella model. Results: Genotyping of all clinical isolates showed the persistence of the same diploid sequence type (DST). Isolates changed their susceptibility profile over time, but there were no significant statistical differences in pathogenicity. Conclusion: Herein, a persistent clonal isolates of C. albicans (DST 918) in a patient with CMC, showed changes in its susceptibility profile after several antifungal treatments acquiring gradual resistance to the azole drugs, which did not affect their pathogenicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据