4.6 Review

A review of phosphorus and phosphides as anode materials for advanced sodium-ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 8, 期 10, 页码 4996-5048

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta12169b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51774251]
  2. Hebei Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars [B2017203313]
  3. Hundreds of Innovative Talents in Hebei Province [SLRC2017057]
  4. opening project of the state key laboratory of Advanced Chemical Power Sources [SKL-ACPSC-11]
  5. Shanghai Education Ministry
  6. Shanghai University PhD Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) are promising low-cost alternatives to lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) in energy storage applications because of the natural abundance of sodium as compared with lithium. However, the radius of Na+ ions is similar to 50% larger than that of Li+ ions, leading to challenging sodiation/desodiation at the anodes of SIBs and reduced performances. Therefore, the exploration of novel SIB anode materials to facilitate sodiation/desodiation has become a leading area of research. Here, cost-effective phosphorus and metal/nonmetal phosphides, possessing high theoretical gravimetric capacities and volumetric specific capacities, have emerged as new and promising anode materials for SIBs. Based on this, this review will provide a comprehensive summary of the recent progress in the development of phosphorus and metal/nonmetal phosphide materials and corresponding composite SIB anodes in terms of material synthesis, characterization, sodium storage mechanism and performance validation in SIB apparatuses. In addition, challenges associated with the development of such advanced materials are summarized and analyzed. Finally, to facilitate the research and development of these emerging SIB anode materials, future research directions are proposed to overcome challenges toward the practical commercialization of sodium-ion batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据