4.7 Article

Development of Korean Air Quality Prediction System version 1 (KAQPS v1) with focuses on practical issues

期刊

GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 1055-1073

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-13-1055-2020

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Strategic Project-Fine Particle of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) of the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT)
  2. Ministry of Environment (MOE)
  3. Ministry of Health andWelfare (MOHW) [NRF-2017M3D8A1092022]
  4. GEMS program of the MOE of the Republic of Korea as part of the Eco-Innovation Program of KEITI [2012000160004]
  5. National Institute of Environment Research (NIER) - MOE of the Republic of Korea [NIER-2019-01-01-028]
  6. Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) [NIER-2019-01-01-028] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For the purpose of providing reliable and robust air quality predictions, an air quality prediction system was developed for the main air quality criteria species in South Korea (PM10, PM2.5, CO, O-3 and SO2). The main caveat of the system is to prepare the initial conditions (ICs) of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model simulations using observations from the Geostationary Ocean Color Imager (GOCI) and ground-based monitoring networks in northeast Asia. The performance of the air quality prediction system was evaluated during the Korea-United States Air Quality Study (KORUS-AQ) campaign period (1 May-12 June 2016). Data assimilation (DA) of optimal interpolation (OI) with Kalman filter was used in this study. One major advantage of the system is that it can predict not only particulate matter (PM) concentrations but also PM chemical composition including five main constituents: sulfate (SO42- ), nitrate (NO3- ), ammonium (NH4+ ), organic aerosols (OAs) and elemental carbon (EC). In addition, it is also capable of predicting the concentrations of gaseous pollutants (CO, O-3 and SO2). In this sense, this new air quality prediction system is comprehensive. The results with the ICs (DA RUN) were compared with those of the CMAQ simulations without ICs (BASE RUN). For almost all of the species, the application of ICs led to improved performance in terms of correlation, errors and biases over the entire campaign period. The DA RUN agreed reasonably well with the observations for PM10 (index of agreement IOA = 0.60; mean bias MB = -13.54 ) and PM2.5 (IOA = 0.71; MB = -2.43 ) as compared to the BASE RUN for PM10 (IOA = 0.51; MB = -27.18 ) and PM2.5 (IOA = 0.67; MB = -9.9 ). A significant improvement was also found with the DA RUN in terms of bias. For example, for CO, the MB of -0.27 (BASE RUN) was greatly enhanced to -0.036 (DA RUN). In the cases of O-3 and SO2, the DA RUN also showed better performance than the BASE RUN. Further, several more practical issues frequently encountered in the air quality prediction system were also discussed. In order to attain more accurate ozone predictions, the DA of NO2 mixing ratios should be implemented with careful consideration of the measurement artifacts (i.e., inclusion of alkyl nitrates, HNO3 and peroxyacetyl nitrates - PANs - in the ground-observed NO2 mixing ratios). It was also discussed that, in order to ensure accurate nocturnal predictions of the concentrations of the ambient species, accurate predictions of the mixing layer heights (MLHs) should be achieved from the meteorological modeling. Several advantages of the current air quality prediction system, such as its non-static free-parameter scheme, dust episode prediction and possible multiple implementations of DA prior to actual predictions, were also discussed. These configurations are all possible because the current DA system is not computationally expensive. In the ongoing and future works, more advanced DA techniques such as the 3D variational (3DVAR) method and ensemble Kalman filter (EnK) are being tested and will be introduced to the Korean air quality prediction system (KAQPS).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据