4.4 Article

Evaluation of three different decontamination techniques on biofilm formation, and on physical and chemical properties of resin composites

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33907

关键词

resin composite; sterilization; biofilm; surface analysis

资金

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [U01 DE023756, K02 DE025280] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesThis study evaluated three different sterilization/disinfection techniques for resin composites on bacterial growth and surface modification after decontamination. MethodsTwo resin composites were sterilized/disinfected with three different techniques: UV light, 1% chloramine T, and 70% ethanol. Four different times were used for each technique to determine the shortest time that the solution or UV light was effective. The influence of sterilization/disinfection technique on bacterial growth was evaluated by analyzing the metabolic activity, using the AlamarBlue assay, bacterial viability, and SEM images from biofilms of Streptococcus mutans. The surface change, after the process, was analyzed with ATR/FTIR and SEM images. The solutions used for decontamination (1% chloramine-T and 70% ethanol) were analyzed with H-1-NMR to identify any resin compounds leached during the process. ResultsOne minute of decontamination was efficient for all three methods tested. Chloramine-T increased the surface porosity on resin composites, no changes were observed for UV light and 70% ethanol, however, H-1-NMR identified leached monomers only when 70% ethanol was used. No chemical change of the materials was found under ATR/FTIR analyses after the decontamination process. Chloramine-T, with no previous wash, increased the bacterial viability for both resin composites and increased the bacterial metabolism for the resin composite without fluoride. ConclusionUV light had no interference on the resin composites properties tested using 1 min of exposure compared to the other decontamination methods. (c) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 106B: 945-953, 2018.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据