3.8 Article

Competitive ability of weedy rice: toward breeding weed-suppressive rice cultivars

期刊

JOURNAL OF CROP IMPROVEMENT
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 455-469

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15427528.2020.1733158

关键词

Allelopathy; Amazon sprangletop (Leptochloa panicoides); barnyardgrass (Echinochola crus-galli); crop improvement; weed suppression

资金

  1. Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a vital crop for achieving global food security. Unfortunately, weeds are the major yield-constraining factor in rice production systems worldwide. Development of rice with higher competitive ability than weeds will help achieve sustainable weed management, as robust rice cultivars will have a competitive advantage over weeds. As wild relatives are often explored by plant breeders in crop improvement programs, greenhouse studies were conducted to evaluate weed-suppressive potential of 54 weedy rice accessions (weedy relatives of cultivated rice) against barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) and Amazon sprangletop (Leptochloa panicoides). Three allelopathic rice cultivars (PI312777, PI338046, and Rondo), and two commercial rice cultivars (CL163 and REX) were included as a positive and negative control, respectively. Among all the test accessions of weedy rice, B2 suppressed the growth of E. crus-galli by 52%, whereas accession B81 suppressed L. panicoides growth by 61%. Accession B81 caused greater than 50% growth inhibition of both E. crus-galli and L. panicoides. Thus, B2 and B81 were identified as the most weed-suppressive weedy rice accessions. Weed-suppressive potential in weedy rice was associated morphologically with hull type and awn length. Weed-suppressive weedy rice accessions identified from this study can be used as a source of raw genetic material in rice improvement programs. Future research should focus on identifying the underlying mechanism for a high weed-suppressive potential of specific weedy rice accessions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据