4.5 Article

Biocompatibility assessment of cyclic olefin copolymers: Impact of two additives on cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, inflammatory reactions, and hemocompatibility

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
卷 105, 期 12, 页码 3333-3349

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.36199

关键词

biocompatibility; cell culture; cyclic olefin copolymers; cytotoxicity; hemocompatibility; inflammation; medical devices; oxidative stress; proteins adhesion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work reports the biocompatibility evaluation of cyclic olefin copolymers (COC) as candidates for implantable medical devices. The focus was to establish the influence of two major additives (antioxidant and lubricant) on the overall biocompatibility. The cytotoxicity was evaluated according to ISO 10993-5 guidelines using L929 fibroblasts, HUVEC, and THP-1-derived macrophages. Oxidative stress (ROS, GSH/GSSG, and SOD analysis) and pro-inflammatory cytokines (Il-6 and TNF- secretion) were quantified using THP-1 cells in direct contact with films. Hemocompatibility was assessed through haemolysis testing, dynamic blood coagulation, platelet adhesion, and activation (membranous P-selectin expression). Results show that the different types of COC have successfully passed the in vitro biocompatibility tests. The presence of antioxidant induces however a slight decrease in ROS production in correlation with a high SOD activity and a modification in blood coagulation profile probably linked to antioxidant recrystallization phenomenon on the surface of COC. The lubricant presence reduced haemolysis, fibrinogen adhesion, and platelet activation. Surface nanotopography of COC highlights different types of needles and globules according to the present additive. Those primary results indicate that COC are promising biomaterial. However, additives influenced some biological parameters pointing out the necessity of a global approach of risk analysis for biocompatibility evaluation. (c) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 105A: 3333-3349, 2017.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据