4.5 Article

Use of lecithin to control fiber morphology in electrospun poly (-caprolactone) scaffolds for improved tissue engineering applications

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
卷 105, 期 10, 页码 2865-2874

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.36139

关键词

electrospinning; tissue engineering; adhesion; scaffolds; pore size

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) as part of the Doctoral Training Account (DTA) [EP/P505631/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We elucidate the effects of incorporating surfactants into electrospun poly (-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffolds on network homogeneity, cellular adherence and osteogenic differentiation. Lecithin was added with a range of concentrations to PCL solutions, which were electrospun to yield functionalized scaffolds. Addition of lecithin yielded a dose-dependent reduction in scaffold hydrophobicity, whilst reducing fiber width and hence increasing specific surface area. These changes in scaffold morphology were associated with increased cellular attachment of Saos-2 osteoblasts 3-h postseeding. Furthermore, cells on scaffolds showed comparable proliferation over 14days of incubation to TCP controls. Through model-based interpretation of image analysis combined with gravimetric estimates of porosity, lecithin is shown to reduce scaffold porosity and mean pore size. Additionally, lecithin incorporation is found to reduce fiber curvature, resulting in increased scaffold specific elastic modulus. Low concentrations of lecithin were found to induce upregulation of several genes associated with osteogenesis in primary mesenchymal stem cells. The results demonstrate that functionalization of electrospun PCL scaffolds with lecithin can increase the biocompatibility and regenerative potential of these networks for bone tissue engineering applications. (c) 2017 The Authors Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 105A: 2865-2874, 2017.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据