4.5 Article

Hemocompatibility evaluation of poly(1,8-octanediol citrate) blend polyethersulfone membranes

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
卷 105, 期 5, 页码 1510-1520

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35986

关键词

poly(diol citrates); poly(1, 8-octanediol citrate) (POC); polyethersulfone (PES); hemocompatible; hemodialysis membrane

资金

  1. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia under Flagship Program [Q.J130000.2409.01G46]
  2. Universiti Teknologi MARA [600-IRMI/DANA5/3/Lestari (0078/2016)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, poly (1,8-octanediol citrate) (POC) was used to modify polyethersulfone (PES)-based membrane to enhance its hemocompatibility. Different compositions of POC (0-3%) were added into the polyethersulfone (PES) dope solutions and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) was used as pore forming agent. The hemocompatible POC modified PES membranes were fabricated through phase-inversion technique. The prepared membranes were characterized using attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Atomic-force microscopy (AFM), contact angle, Zeta-potential, membrane porosity and pore size and pure water flux (PWF) and BSA rejection. The hemocompatibility of the modified PES membranes was evaluated by human serum fibrinogen (FBG) protein adsorption, platelet adhesion, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and prothrombin time (PT), and thrombin-antithrombin III (TAT), complement (C3a and C5a) activation and Ca2+ absorption on membrane. Results showed that by increasing POC concentration, FBG adsorption was reduced, less platelets adhesion, prolonged APTT and PT, lower TAT, C5a and C3a activation and absorb more Ca2+ ion. These results indicated that modification of PES with POC has rendered improved hemocompatibility properties for potential application in the field of blood purification, especially in hemodialysis. (C) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据