4.6 Article

Accuracy of an automated knowledge base for identifying drug adverse reactions

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 72-81

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.12.005

关键词

Pharmacovigilance; Adverse drug reaction; Machine-learning experiment; Knowledge base; Health outcome

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging [K01AG044433]
  2. National Library of Medicine [R01LM011838]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Drug safety researchers seek to know the degree of certainty with which a particular drug is associated with an adverse drug reaction. There are different sources of information used in pharma-covigilance to identify, evaluate, and disseminate medical product safety evidence including spontaneous reports, published peer-reviewed literature, and product labels. Automated data processing and classification using these evidence sources can greatly reduce the manual curation currently required to develop reference sets of positive and negative controls(i.e. drugs that cause adverse drug events and those that do not) to be used in drug safety research. Methods: In this paper we explore a method for automatically aggregating disparate sources of information together into a single repository, developing a predictive model to classify drug-adverse event relationships, and applying those predictions to a real world problem of identifying negative controls for statistical method calibration. Results: Our results showed high predictive accuracy for the models combining all available evidence, with an area under the receiver-operator curve of when tested on three manually generated lists of drugs and conditions that are known to either have or not have an association with an adverse drug event. Conclusions: Results from a pilot implementation of the method suggests that it is feasible to develop a scalable alternative to the time-and-resource-intensive, manual curation exercise previously applied to develop reference sets of positive and negative controls to be used in drug safety research. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据