4.5 Article

A computational study of invariant I5 in a nearly incompressible transversely isotropic model for white matter

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 57, 期 -, 页码 146-151

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.03.025

关键词

White matter; Biomechanics; Constitutive modeling of biomaterials; Finite element methods; Tissue mechanics

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [61503267]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province Grant [BK20140356]
  3. Education Ministry of Jiangsu Province Grant [16KJB460018]
  4. Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry [K511701515]
  5. NIH [R01 NS092853]
  6. School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering (AME) at the University of Oklahoma
  7. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aligned axonal fiber bundles in white matter make it suitable to be modeled as a transversely isotropic material. Recent experimental studies have shown that a minimal form, nearly incompressible transversely isotropic (MITI) material model, is capable of describing mechanical anisotropy of white matter. Here, we used a finite element (FE) computational approach to demonstrate the significance of the fifth invariant (Is) when modeling the anisotropic behavior of white matter in the large-strain regime. We first implemented and validated the MITI model in an FE simulation framework for large deformations. Next, we applied the model to a plate-hole structural problem to highlight the significance of the invariant Is by comparing with the standard fiber reinforcement (SFR) model. We also compared the two models by fitting the experiment data of asymmetric indentation, shear test, and uniaxial stretch of white matter. Our results demonstrated the significance of is in describing shear deformation/anisotropy, and illustrated the potential of the MITI model to characterize transversely isotropic white matter tissues in the large-strain regime. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据