4.5 Article

A female head-neck model for rear impact simulations

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 51, 期 -, 页码 49-56

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.066

关键词

Female; Finite element; Human body model; Rear impact; Whiplash

资金

  1. VINNOVA - Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems [2013-03095]
  2. Vinnova [2013-03095] Funding Source: Vinnova
  3. Swedish Research Council [2013-03095] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K17945] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several mathematical cervical models of the 50th percentile male have been developed and used for impact biomechanics research. However, for the 50th percentile female no similar modelling efforts have been made, despite females being subject to a higher risk of soft tissue neck injuries. This is a limitation for the development of automotive protective systems addressing Whiplash Associated Disorders (WADs), most commonly caused in rear impacts, as the risk for females sustaining WAD symptoms is double that of males. In this study, a finite element head and neck model of a 50th percentile female was validated in rear impacts. A previously validated ligamentous cervical spine model was complemented with a rigid body head, soft tissues and muscles. In both physiological flexion-extension motions and simulated rear impacts, the kinematic response at segment level was comparable to that of human subjects. Evaluation of ligament stress levels in simulations with varied initial cervical curvature revealed that if an individual assumes a more lordotic posture than the neutral, a higher risk of WAD might occur in rear impact. The female head and neck model, together with a kinematical whole body model which is under development, addresses a need for tools for assessment of automotive protection systems for the group which is at the highest risk to sustain WAD. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据