4.5 Article

The use of a single inertial sensor to estimate 3-dimensional ground reaction force during accelerative running tasks

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 263-268

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.07.035

关键词

Inertial sensor; Accelerometer; Ground reaction force

资金

  1. Appalachian State University Office of Student Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the feasibility of using a single inertial measurement unit (IMU) placed on the sacrum to estimate 3-dimensional ground reaction force (F) during linear acceleration and change of direction tasks. Force plate measurements of F and estimates from the proposed IMU method were collected while subjects (n = 15) performed a standing sprint start (SS) and a 45 degrees change of direction task (COD). Error in the IMU estimate of step-averaged component and resultant F was quantified by comparison to estimates from the force plate using Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement (LOA), root mean square error (RMSE), Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient (r), and the effect size (ES) of the differences betvieen the two systems. RMSE of the IMU estimate of step average F ranged from 37.70 N to 77.05 N with ES between 0.04 and 0.47 for SS while for COD, RMSE was between 54.19 N to 182.92 N with ES between 0.08 and 1.69. Correlation coefficients between the IMU and force plate measurements were significant (p <= 0.05) for all values (r = 0.53 to 0.95) except the medio-lateral component of step-average F. The average angular error in the IMU estimate of the orientation of step-average F was <= 10 degrees for all tasks. The results of this study suggest the proposed IMU method may be used to estimate sagittal plane components and magnitude of step-average F during a linear standing sprint start as well as the vertical component and magnitude of step-average F during a 45 change of direction task. (C) 20 17 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据