4.2 Article

Experimental and Theoretical Study on Arrival Times and Effective Velocities in the Case of Long-Range Propagation of Acoustical Pulses Along the Shelf Edge in a Shallow Sea

期刊

ACOUSTICAL PHYSICS
卷 66, 期 1, 页码 21-32

出版社

PLEIADES PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1134/S106377102001008X

关键词

shallow-water acoustics; broadband signals; arrival times; intermodal dispersion; group velocity; horizontal refraction; acoustical ranging

资金

  1. Program of Russian Academy of Sciences New challenges of the Earth's climate system [18-1-004]
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) [18-05-00057_a, 18-35-20081_mol_a_ved]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An experimental study aimed at the measurement of arrival times and effective velocities of acoustical pulses propagating approximately along the edge of the continental shelf was conducted in the Sea of Japan in early autumn. In a posteriori theoretical analysis and modeling of sound propagation in this experiment modal structure of acoustical field along the path was described and a number of general conclusions on the formation of such fields in course of sound propagation over distances of tens and hundreds of kilometers were formulated. An algorithm for predicting effective velocities of long-range propagation of acoustical pulses in shallow water was developed on the basis of these conclusions. The algorithm is based on the averaging of group velocities of the first modal component of the pulse over the entire track. It was shown that on the considered path of approximately 136 kilometers horizontal refraction is one of the major factors contributing to the dispersion of pulsed signals. This effect also causes additional delays as compared to the sound propagation along the respective geodesic path on the Earth's surface. Implications of the importance of taking the horizontal refraction into account in estimation of arrival times in the modeling of long-range propagation and the solution of acoustical ranging problems are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据