4.7 Article

Splitting and recombination of bright-solitary-matter waves

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS PHYSICS
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s42005-020-0320-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L010844/1, EP/K030558/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/L010844/1, EP/K030558/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bright solitary waves are wavepackets that propagate without dispersion and have been under intense investigation in a variety of settings, including Bose-Einstein condensates (BEC), with a view of realizing a matter-wave interferometer. The authors present experimental and theoretical results on a bright-matter-wave soliton from a BEC, and observe splitting and recombination at a barrier potential enabling them to place constraints on the barrier stability needed to implement soliton interferometry. Atomic Bose-Einstein condensates confined in quasi-1D waveguides can support bright-solitary-matter waves when interatomic interactions are sufficiently attractive to cancel dispersion. Such solitary-matter waves are excellent candidates for highly sensitive interferometers, as their non-dispersive nature allows them to acquire phase shifts for longer times than conventional matter-wave interferometers. In this work, we demonstrate experimentally the splitting and recombination of a bright-solitary-matter wave on a narrow repulsive barrier, realizing the fundamental components of an interferometer. We show that for a sufficiently narrow barrier, interference-mediated recombination can dominate over velocity-filtering effects. Our theoretical analysis shows that interference-mediated recombination is extremely sensitive to the barrier position, predicting strong oscillations in the interferometer output as the barrier position is adjusted over just a few micrometres. These results highlight the potential of soliton interferometry, while putting tight constraints on the barrier stability needed in future experimental implementations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据