4.6 Article

A New In Situ Quasi-continuous Solar-wind Source of Molecular Water on Mercury

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 891, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab6bda

关键词

Ice formation; Planetary polar regions; Planetary science; Impact phenomena; Solar-planetary interactions; Astrochemistry

资金

  1. NASA Solar System Exploration Research Virtual Institute (SSERVI) [NNA17BF68A]
  2. NASA Planetary Atmospheres programs [NNX14AH41G, NNX14AJ46G]
  3. NASA [NNX14AH41G, 680233, NNX14AJ46G, 681571] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Radar observations of Mercury and the MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) spacecraft data indicate the probable existence of water ice in the permanently shadowed polar regions. Generally, water is accepted to be of exogenous origin through delivery via comets and meteoritic impact. However, a continuous water formation process that involves thermal transformation of chemically stable mineral-bound hydroxyl groups produced by implanted solar-wind protons is readily available on the surface of Mercury. At typical temperatures prevailing on Mercury's dayside surface, H2O can be produced from reactions involving OH groups on or within the H-saturated regolith grain interfaces. Similar reactions will also occur due to micrometeorite impact events on both the dayside and nightside. Once produced, H2O is released into the exosphere and then transported and processed via Jeans escape, photodissociation, dissociative adsorption, or condensation. Water reaching cold traps will be bound over geological periods. This simple water cycle will produce a highly chemically reduced surface and can deliver significant amounts of H2O to the permanently shadowed regions of Mercury over geological time periods. The overall process is an important but hitherto unnoticed source term that will contribute to the accumulation of water in the cold traps and polar regions of Mercury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据