4.7 Article

Examination of effects of aerosols on a pyroCb and their dependence on fire intensity and aerosol perturbation

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 20, 期 6, 页码 3357-3371

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-20-3357-2020

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [80NSSC20K0131, NNX16AN61G]
  2. National Science Foundation [AGS 1837811]
  3. National Strategic Project Fine particle of the National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science and ICT
  4. Ministry of Health and Welfare [NRF-2017M3D8A1092022]
  5. Ministry of Education [NRF-2018R1D1A1A09083227]
  6. National Institute of Environmental Research - Ministry of Environment [NIER-2019-01-02-085]
  7. Ministry of Environment
  8. Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) [NIER-2019-01-02-085] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using a modeling framework, this study investigates how a pyrocumulonimbus (pyroCb) event influences water vapor concentrations and cirrus-cloud properties near the tropopause, specifically focusing on how fire-produced aerosols affect this role. Results from a case study show that when observed fire intensity is high, there is an insignificant impact of fire-produced aerosols on the development of the pyroCb and associated changes in water vapor and cirrus clouds near the tropopause. However, as fire intensity weakens, effects of those aerosols on microphysical variables and processes such as droplet size and autoconversion increase. Due to this, aerosol-induced invigoration of convection is significant for pyroCb with weak-intensity fires and associated weak surface heat fluxes. This leads to a situation where there is a greater aerosol effect on the transport of water vapor to the upper troposphere and the production of cirrus clouds with weak-intensity fires, whereas this effect is muted with strong-intensity fires.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据