4.7 Article

Hierarchical Architectured Ternary Nanostructures Photocatalysts with In(OH)3 Nanocube on ZnIn2S4/NiS Nanosheets for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution

期刊

SOLAR RRL
卷 4, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/solr.202000027

关键词

cocatalysts; H-2 evolution; photocatalysts; visble light; ZnIn2S4

资金

  1. 1000 Plan Professorship for Young Talents and Hundred Talents Program of Fujian Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Charge carriers separation and surface catalytic reactions are two crucial steps in photocatalytic processes; the rational design of photocatalysts by taking these two factors into consideration is thus of great importance to advance the associated performance. Herein, a self-sacrificial strategy is developed to fabricate a ternary nanostructure photocatalyst, forming a hierarchical architecture of In(OH)(3) nanocube decorated NiS-ZnIn2S4 (ZIS) hybrid nanosheets (ZIS/In(OH)(3)-NiS). Such a unique structure provides the hybrid photocatalyst with a facilitated path for efficiently separating the charge carrier and abundant sites for catalytic reactions. Systematic characterizations that reveal the strong electronic interactions in the ternary ZIS/In(OH)(3)-NiS leads to fast electron transfer from excited ZnIn2S4 to NiS nanosheets, which provide catalytic sites for hydrogen evolution reaction. The comprehensive photocatalysis studies demonstrate that ZnIn2S4/In(OH)(3)-NiS exhibits ultrahigh photocatalytic activity toward hydrogen generation with a high rate of 7010 mu mol g(-1) h(-1), which ranks as one of the highest among ZnIn2S4-based photocatalysts reported so far. This work provides an attractive and effective way to develop high-activity photocatalysts without using precious metal cocatalysts. The investigation brings us one step closer to understanding the structure-determining properties of nanohybrid architecture, and provides a valuable reference to develop cost-effective and practical photocatalysts for a variety of applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据