4.3 Article

Detecting Beam Blockage in Radar-Based Precipitation Estimates

期刊

JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY
卷 34, 期 7, 页码 1407-1422

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0174.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Commerce's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NA09NOS4780196]
  2. U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2011-67019-20042]
  3. NIFA [2011-67019-20042, 579883] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gridded radar-based quantitative precipitation estimates (QPEs) are potentially ideal inputs for hydrological modeling and monitoring because of their high spatiotemporal resolution. Beam blockage is a common type of bias in radar QPEs related to the blockage of the radar beam by an obstruction, such as topography or tall buildings. This leads to a diminishment in the power of the transmitted beam beyond the range of obstruction and a systematic underestimation of reflectivity return to the radar site. A new spatial analysis technique for objectively identifying regions in which precipitation estimates are contaminated by beam blockage was developed. The methodology requires only a long-term precipitation climatology with no prerequisite knowledge of topography or known obstructions needed. For each radar domain, the QPEs are normalized by climatology and a low-pass Fourier series fit captures the expected precipitation as a function of azimuth angle. Beam blockage signatures are identified as radially coherent regions with normalized values that are systematically lower than the Fourier fit. Precipitation estimates sufficiently affected by beam blockage can be replaced by values estimated using neighboring unblocked estimates. The methodology is applied to the correction of the National Weather Service radar-based QPE dataset, whose estimates originate from the NEXRAD network in the central and eastern United States. The methodology is flexible enough to be useful for most radar installations and geographical regions with at least a few years of data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据