4.6 Article

Tailorable nanoarchitecturing of bimetallic nickel-cobalt hydrogen phosphate via the self-weaving of nanotubes for efficient oxygen evolution

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 3035-3047

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta13442e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [FT150100479, FL160100089, 322170-0355/51, 322170-0348/07]
  2. Indonesian Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education (RISTEK-DIKTI) under the World Class University (WCU) program
  3. RISTEK-DIKTI
  4. ITB
  5. International Cooperative Graduate Program (ICGP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the tailorable self-weaving of bimetallic nickel-cobalt (Ni-Co) hydrogen phosphate nanotubes into one-dimensional (1D) microspindles or two-dimensional (2D) sheet-like structures by utilizing monodispersed Ni-Co glycerate spheres as sacrificial templates. The conversion process is achieved through a two-step solvothermal method in the presence of phosphoric acid (H3PO4) as a phosphorus source and promoter of the self-weaving process. The formation of such nanotube-assembled architectures is promoted by the peeling-self-weaving mechanism, in which the bimetallic Ni-Co hydrogen phosphate nanotubes initially grow on the surface of the Ni-Co glycerate spheres due to the reactions between Ni and Co metals bonded to the glycerate anions with hydrogen phosphate anions present in the solution. This is followed by the peeling of the overgrown nanotubes from the etched glycerate spheres and their self-weaving into 1D or 2D architectures depending on the Ni/Co molar ratio. The electrocatalytic test results reveal the superior activity of the Ni-rich Ni-Co hydrogen phosphate electrode for oxygen evolution reaction (OER) compared to its Co-rich and equimolar counterparts, leading to smaller overpotential of 320 mV and lower Tafel slope of 84 mV dec(-1). Post-OER analysis of this sample reveals that the high OER activity is derived from the formation of active Ni-Co oxyhydroxide phase on its surface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据