4.0 Article

Hepatocytic differentiation of iPS cells on decellularized liver tissue

期刊

JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS
卷 20, 期 4, 页码 318-325

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s10047-017-0977-2

关键词

Induced pluripotent stem cell; Decellularized tissue; Hepatocytic differentiation

资金

  1. National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center [25-2-2]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan
  3. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Decellularized tissues (DETs) have been attracting great attention as scaffolds for tissue-engineering approaches. Recently, some studies have reported that decellularized liver tissues (DLT) can provide an excellent environment for the hepatocytic differentiation of hepatic stem/progenitor cells that were already committed to the hepatocyte lineage. However, the effects of DLT on the hepatocytic differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSs) have not yet been established. Here we studied the hepatocytic differentiation of iPSs on DLT and decellularized heart tissues (DHT) in order to determine the tissue-specific effects of DETs on iPSs differentiation. Our results showed that DLTs led to higher gene expression levels of forkhead box A2 (a marker of endoderm) and CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-alpha (master transcription factor to hepatocyte differentiation), alpha-fetoprotein (a marker of fetal hepatocyte,), and albumin (a marker of fetal and mature hepatocyte) of iPSs than on DHTs. Furthermore, gene expression levels of tyrosine aminotransferase (a marker of mature hepatocyte) were higher on DLT than that on DHT, and immunocytochemical analysis and ELISA assay showed that albumin secretion level of iPSs on DLT was higher than that on DHT. Our study demonstrated that the use of DLTs led to mature hepatocytic differentiation levels of iPSs compared to DHTs, which provides a better niche for iPSs cell engineering and enables the preparation of useful mature cells for regenerative therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据