期刊
HISTORICAL MATERIALISM-RESEARCH IN CRITICAL MARXIST THEORY
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 51-84出版社
BRILL
DOI: 10.1163/1569206X-00001851
关键词
value theory; Uno School; monetary theory of value; Japanese Marxism; neoclassical economics; labour theory of value
Even after the demise of the influential Uno School in the 1980s, Japanese economists have been continuously engaged in the categorial reconstruction of Marx's Critique of Political Economy, especially the theory of value and money. Writing in the 1980s-2000s, authors of the 'post-Uno School', such as Ebitsuka Akira, Mukai Kimitoshi, Kataoka Koji etc., broadened the value-theoretical views of Uno School orthodoxy to include, among others, the Neue Marx-Lekture (predominantly H.-G. Backhaus and M. Heinrich) and the French economists C. Benetti and J. Cartelier. This paper will confront the 'post-Uno School's' reading of Marx's theory of value, which poses the theories of value and money as unreconcilable, leading them to discard the theory of value in favour of a 'monetary approach'. We show that the dismissal of value theory leads to an introduction of Baileyan and neo-classical elements into Marx's theory, which we believe to be both theoretically and practically precarious.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据