4.5 Article

The relationship between bird distribution patterns and environmental factors in an ecotone area of northeast Brazil

期刊

JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 6-13

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2017.01.004

关键词

Cerrado; Caatinga; Ecotone; Environmental variables; Endemism

资金

  1. Birds of Caatinga (Ayes da Caatinga) [CNPQ 552011/2011-8]
  2. CNPQ [205417/2014-0]
  3. Capes Doctoral's fellowship
  4. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientffico e Tecnologico-CNPq [303252/2013-8]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Determining the processes that contribute to the establishment and maintenance of species diversity has been one of the great challenges for biologists. Of the many mechanisms and factors that affect diversity, environmental condition (i.e. the biophysical characteristics of habitats) is one of the main drivers structuring biological communities. In the present study, we assessed bird diversity patterns in a Cerrado-Caatinga ecotone area in the northeast of Brazil and investigated which environmental variables determined variation in species richness and composition among habitats. Cerrado areas had the highest richness of bird species among sampled sites, with ecotone areas presenting an intermediate richness, and Caatinga sites containing the lowest richness. There was a higher occurrence of generalist species from the two surrounding biomes in the ecotone region. However, some endemic species to the Caatinga were also found in the ecotone region, but only within habitat patches typical of the Caatinga. Ternperature and humidity were the two most important environmental variables in explaining variation in species composition among study sites. Therefore, our results suggest climatic differences between habitat types underpin changes in local species composition and, thus, can be used to inform predictions about the potential impacts of future environmental changes on bird communities in this region. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据