3.8 Article

Nanostructured surface bioactive composite scaffold for filling of bone defects

期刊

BIOINTERFACE RESEARCH IN APPLIED CHEMISTRY
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 5038-5047

出版社

BIOINTERFACE RESEARCH APPLIED CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.33263/BRIAC102.038047

关键词

bone substitute; bioactive surface; hybrid scaffold; nanohydroxyapatite; osseointegration; regenerative medicine

资金

  1. Ethics Board of the Italian National Institute of Health [781/2015-PR]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to investigate the chemical and physical surface properties of a hybrid nanohydroxyapatite/collagen/polycaprolactone (nHA/Coll/PCL) material, and to test its in vitro biocompatibility and in vivo osteointegration. Mineralized collagen fibers with nHA were admixed with PCL at a weight proportion of 50:50. The material was characterized by transmission X-ray diffraction (XRD), electron microscopy (TEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), force spectroscopy, X-ray Photoemission Spectroscopy (XPS), and biocompatibility testing using human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and Hepatocyte carcinoma (HePG2) and primary osteogenic sarcoma (SAOS-2) cells as complementary tests. In addition, the ability of this material to fill three- wall bony defects was tested in the mandible of a sheep. The material had confirmed the relative low crystallinity of the HA having a nano-sized dimension, which was composed of only oxygen, carbon, calcium and phosphorus, without no residual cytotoxic element. Human MSCs on the surface scaffold showed high metabolic activity and a high rate of viability. Biocompatibility complementary testing using HePG2 and SAOS-2 cells showed good metabolic activity, and the lactate dehydrogenase assay using HePG2 cells demonstrated no significant cytotoxicity. Histological analysis of the in-vivo experimentation showed osteointegration of the material and the absence of inflammatory cells at the bone-scaffold interface. Some areas showed bone-cell seeding and isolated agglomerates of bone cells were evident in the inner scaffold.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据