3.8 Article

Does Geographical Discrimination Exist in Online Lending in China: An Empirical Study Based on Chinese Loan Platform Renren

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijfs8010015

关键词

online lending; geographical discrimination; success rate of borrowing; borrowing rate

资金

  1. Key project of Chinese National Social Science Fund (Research on the Collaborative Path of the Evolution of Internet Lending)
  2. Key project of Chinese National Social Science Fund (Financing Advancement of Small and Micro Enterprises under the New Financial Normality) [15AJY018]
  3. key project of Chongqing University [CQDXWL-2014-Z019, 106112016CDJXY020013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Online lending has developed rapidly in China in recent years, into a typical Internet financial model. China's online lending related issues have received widespread attention from scholars. Methods: This study used 396,634 order data-points (935,037 original order data-points) from the Renren Loan website since its inception in January 2017. We used ordinary least squares (OLS) regression to study the problem of geographical discrimination in online lending in China, and we conducted two robust tests. Results: Studies have shown that significant geographical discrimination exists in China's online lending market. From the perspective of the lender, different investment intentions exist for borrowers from various regions, thereby leading to variations in the success rates of loans. From the perspective of the borrower, the belief exists that borrowers from different regions will have varying interest rates because of the effect of geographical discrimination. Conclusion: We believe that geographical discrimination is due to the effects of the economic, financial, educational, and ethnic conditions of the borrower's location on willingness to invest and the success rate of borrowing. However, borrowers' self-discrimination is primarily related to economic and ethnic differences among provinces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据