4.4 Article

Synthesis of cyclic aromatic polymer containing thiophene or pyridine by means of unstoichiometric Suzuki-Miyaura cyclic polycondensation: Effect of the position of bromine of heteroarylenes on cyclic polycondensation

期刊

JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 58, 期 9, 页码 1236-1240

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pol.20200036

关键词

cyclic polymer; heteroarylene; intermolecular transfer; intramolecular transfer; Suzuki-Miyaura polycondensation; palladium catalyst

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [S1311032]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [15H03819]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H03819] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Suzuki-Miyaura cyclic polycondensation of 1.3 equivalents of thiophene dibromide or pyridine dibromide with 1.0 equivalent of phenylenediboronic acid ester was investigated in the presence of t-Bu3PPd G2 precatalyst, which generates t-Bu3PPd(0), and CsF/18-crown-6 as a base. Polycondensation of 2,5-dibromothiophene and 5,5 '-dibromo-2,2 '-bithiophene with pinacol meta-phenylenediboronate (2) yielded corresponding cyclic polymers. On the other hand, polycondensation of 3,4-dibromothiophene with para-phenylenediboronate (5) gave linear polymer with bromothiophene at both ends via conventional unstoichiometric polycondensation involving excess dibromo monomer, implying that intramolecular catalyst transfer did not proceed effectively on 3,4-dibromothiophene. A model reaction of 3,4-dibromothiophene with phenylboronic acid indeed gave monosubstituted thiophene preferentially via intermolecular catalyst transfer. In the polycondensation of excess pyridine dibromide with 5, the use of 2,6-dibromopyridine gave linear polymer, whereas the use of 3,5-dibromopyridine yielded cyclic polymer. Thus, the position of bromine in heteroarylenes determines whether cyclic polymer or linear polymer is formed, in contrast to the case of unstoichiometric Suzuki-Miyaura cyclic polycondensation with dibromophenylenes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据