4.6 Article

Thiourea modified hyper-crosslinked polystyrene resin for heavy metal ions removal from aqueous solutions

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 135, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.45568

关键词

adsorption; functionalization of polymers; resins

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21376279, 21425627]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China-SINOPEC Joint fund [U1663220]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [611150876068]
  4. China and Guangdong Technology Research Center for Synthesis and Separation of Thermosensitive Chemicals [2015B090903061]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A hyper-crosslinked resin chemically modified with thiourea (TM-HPS) was synthesized, characterized, and evaluated for the removal of heavy metal ions (Pb2+, Cd2+, and Cu2+) from aqueous solutions. The structural characterization results showed that a few thiourea groups were grafted on the surface of the resin with a big BET surface area and a large number of narrow micropores. Various experimental conditions such as pH, contact time, temperature, and initial metal concentration of the three heavy metal ions onto TM-HPS were investigated systematically. The results indicated that the prepared resin was effective for the removal of the heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions. The isotherm data could be better fitted by Langmuir model, yielding maximum adsorption capacities of 689.65, 432.90, and 290.69 mg/g for Pd2+, Cd2+, and Cu2+, respectively. And the adsorption kinetics of the three metal ions followed the pseudo-second-order equation. FTIR and XPS analysis of TM-HPS before and after adsorption further revealed that the adsorption mechanism could be a synergistic effect between functional groups and metal ions and electrostatic attraction, which may provide a new insight into the design of highly effective adsorbents and their potential technological applications for the removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions. (C) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据