4.7 Article

Stress environment of entry driven along gob-side through numerical simulation incorporating the angle of break

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2019.03.003

关键词

Stress environment; Angle of break; Gob-side; Numerical simulation; Double-yield

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51804209]
  2. NSFC-Shanxi Joint Fund for Coal-Based Low-Carbon Technology [U1710258]
  3. Shanxi Applied Basic Research Programs, Science and Technology Foundation for Youths [201801D221363]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Angle of break (AOB) is the acute angle created by the coal seam bedding plane and caving line formed by roof strata movement after extraction of a longwall panel. It has a significant influence on stress redistribution both in the gob and abutment. Throughout numerical simulation investigations up to now, little attention has been paid to it or an AOB of 90 degrees was used, which however, is not realistic. This paper presents a detailed numerical modelling incorporating the AOB against Zhenchengdi Coal Mine. The AOB was obtained through cross-measure boreholes. Hoek-Brown constitutive model was used to simulate the rock masses. Double-yield constitutive model, which was best fitted by Salamon's model, was used to simulate the gob. The results show that a / \ shape shear failure zone develops around the gob. The shear failure in the floor along the panel edge is due to opposite shear of rock mass on two sides of the caving line, and the number of yielded zones within the gob floor close to the gob edge is smaller. According to the research, the entry was determined to be driven under the gob edge employing split-level longwall panel layout (SLPL). The other numerical simulation for SLPL shows that stress around the god-side entry is much smaller than pre-mining stress, and the area of intact rock mass at the elevating section is larger than conventional layout. Numerical modelling was then validated by field observation. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of China University of Mining & Technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据