4.6 Article

Microwave absorbing and mechanical properties of alternating multilayer carbonyl iron powder-poly(vinyl chloride) composites

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 135, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.45846

关键词

alternating layered structure; carbonyl iron powder; microwave absorbing

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51227802, 51473103, 51421061, 51273132]
  2. Sichuan Province Youth Science Fund [2014JQ0001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polymeric composites filled with magnetic absorbents have been used extensively as microwave absorbing materials. However, their high filler content obstructed the application. In order to optimize the filler content and further improve the microwave absorbing properties, alternating multilayer carbonyl iron powder (CIP)/poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) composites were designed and prepared by stacking neat PVC and CIP filled PVC alternately. The microwave absorbing properties were theoretically calculated by the transmission line theory and experimentally measured by the arch method, respectively. The experimental results were consistent with the calculated ones, which demonstrated that the alternating multilayer structure design can significantly improve the microwave absorbing property without increasing the filler content. The consistent results also demonstrated that the reflection loss (R-L) of the multilayer composites was strongly dependent on the layer number and layer arranging sequence. The minimum R-L (R-L-min) and effective bandwidth were exponentially dependent on the layer number. And the dependencies of the R-L-min and effective bandwidth on layer number exhibited a regularity reversal phenomenon when different layers faced to the incident wave. The mechanical property test showed that the alternating multilayer composites possessed enhanced tensile strength and elongation at break as the layer number increased. (c) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 45846.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据