4.6 Article

PEO-NaPF6 Blended Polymer Electrolyte for Solid State Sodium Battery

期刊

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/ab741b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Technologies R&D Program, China [2016YFB0901500]
  2. Opening Project of Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Chemical Materials and Devices, Ministry of Education, Jianghan University [JDGD-201703]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51725206, 51421002]
  4. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA21070500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solid-state polymer electrolytes (SPEs) are proposed as promising candidates for application in sodium batteries to replace the organic liquid electrolytes for enhanced safety. In this study, we first verified the feasibility of PEO-NaPF6 SPE in solid-state sodium batteries (SSBs). The explored PEO-NaPF6 SPEs exhibit a relatively high ionic conductivity of similar to 6.3 x 10(-4) S cm(-1) at 80 degrees C, a large Na+ transference number (t(Na+)) of 0.58, and sufficient thermal stability at around 200 degrees C for SSBs. More importantly, the PEO-NaPF6 SPEs afford excellent long-term cycling performances for the Na parallel to Na3V2(PO4)(3)@C cell at 80 degrees C (85.8% capacity retention at 2 degrees C after 200 cycles) and the Na parallel to NaNi2/Cu-9(1)/9Fe1/3Mn1/3O2 cell at 80 degrees C (77% capacity retention at 0.5 degrees C after 100 cycles). All of the properties make the PEO-NaPF6 SPE a potential alternative for application in SSBs. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published on behalf of The Electrochemical Society by IOP Publishing Limited. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License (CC BYNC-ND, http://creativecommons.orelicenses/by-nc-nd14.0/), which permits non-commercial reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is not changed in any way and is properly cited. For permission for commercial reuse please email: oa@.electrochem.org

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据