4.1 Article

Evaluation of Phytochemical, Polyphenol Composition and Anti-corrosion Capacity of Cucumis anguria L. Leaf Extract on Metal Surface in Sulfuric Acid Medium

出版社

MAIK NAUKA/INTERPERIODICA/SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1134/S2070205120010050

关键词

Cucumis anguria L; phytochemical; UHPLC; corrosion; Mild steel; XRD; Raman; SEM-EDX; AFM

资金

  1. KU Research Professor Program of Konkuk University
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [22A20153813519] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cucumis anguria L. (C. anguria L.) commonly known as Indian gherkin is originally from Africa, though now seen widely in southeast, northeast and north of Brazil. The leaf was examined for phytochemicals and its role in inhibiting corrosion of mild steel in 1 M H2SO4. The phytochemical quantification of total phenols (TPC) (89.32 mg/g), total flavonoid (TFC) (35.88 mg/g), tannins (8.99 mg/g) and steroids (18.21 mg/g) were identified. A detailed analysis of phenolic constituents had shown the presence of significant amount of myricetin (358.54 mu g/g), quercetin (294.25 mu g/g), salicylic acid (288.21 mu g/g), chlorogenic acid (252.31 mu g/g) and kaempferol (201.01 mu g/g). This interesting identification paved way taking an initiative for finding the anticorrosive nature of the extract through electrochemical and non-electrochemical (weight loss) studies. The weight loss study highlighted a significant change in weight when incubated at 330 +/- 1 K with inhibitor (250 ppm) than without inhibitor providing us an optimum concentration of inhibitor. Later the surface analysis was made using Raman, XRD, SEM-EDX and AFM. Raman spectroscopy confirmed the existence of a protective film created by C. anguria L. leaf extract on metal surface (mild steel). The maximum inhibition efficiency of 92.39% was reached using 250 ppm of the C. anguria L. leaf extract inhibitor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据