4.6 Article

finite element model for simulating second generation high temperature superconducting coils/stacks with large number of turns

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 122, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4995802

关键词

-

资金

  1. China State Grid Corporation Science and Technology Project [DG71-14-045]
  2. Royal Academy of Engineering's Research Fellowship Scheme (SMES and Superconducting machines)
  3. EPSRC [EP/P002277/1]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/P002277/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/P002277/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An efficient two dimensional T-A formulation based approach is proposed to calculate the electromagnetic characteristics of tape stacks and coils made of second generation high temperature superconductors. In the approach, a thin strip approximation of the superconductor is used in which the superconducting layer is modeled as a 1-dimensional domain. The formulation is mainly based on the calculation of the current vector potential T in the superconductor layer and the calculation of the magnetic vector potential A in the whole space, which are coupled together in the model. Compared with previous T-based models, the proposed model is innovative in terms of magnetic vector potential A solving, which is achieved by using the differential method, instead of the integral method. To validate the T-A formulation model, it is used to simulate racetrack coils made of second generation high temperature superconducting (2G HTS) tape, and the results are compared with the experimentally obtained data on the AC loss. The results show that the T-A formulation is accurate and efficient in calculating 2G HTS coils, including magnetic field distribution, current density distribution, and AC loss. Finally, the proposed model is used for simulating a 2000 turn coil to demonstrate its effectiveness and efficiency in simulating large-scale 2G HTS coils. Published by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据